 
	Can you solve the multiplying rabbits riddle? - Alex Gendler
 After years of experiments,
  you’ve finally created 
 the pets of the future–
  nano-rabbits!
  They’re tiny, they’re fuzzy…
  and they multiply faster 
 than the eye can see.
  In your lab there are 36 habitat cells,
  arranged in an inverted pyramid,
  with 8 cells in the top row.
  The first has one rabbit,
  the second has two, and so on,
  with eight rabbits in the last one.
  The other rows of cells are empty…
  for now.
  The rabbits are hermaphroditic,
  and each rabbit in a given 
 cell will breed once
  with every rabbit in the horizontally 
 adjacent cells,
  producing exactly one offspring each time.
  The newborn rabbits will 
 drop into the cell
  directly below the 
 two cells of its parents,
  and within minutes will mature 
 and reproduce in turn.
  Each cell can hold 10^80 nano-rabbits –
  that’s a 1 followed by 80 zeros –
  before they break free 
 and overrun the world.
  Your calculations have given you a 
 46-digit number
  for the count of rabbits 
 in the bottom cell–
  plenty of room to spare.
  But just as you pull the lever 
 to start the experiment,
  your assistant runs in with terrible news.
  A rival lab has sabotaged your code
  so that all the zeros at the end 
 of your results got cut off.
  That means you don’t actually know
  if the bottom cell will be able to hold 
 all the rabbits –
  and the reproduction is already underway!
  To make matters worse,
  your devices and calculators 
 are all malfunctioning,
  so you only have a few minutes 
 to work it out by hand.
  How many trailing zeros should there be
  at the end of the count of rabbits 
 in the bottom habitat?
  And do you need to pull the emergency 
 shut-down lever?
  Pause the video now if you want 
 to figure it out for yourself.
  Answer in 3
  Answer in 2
  Answer in 1
  There isn’t enough time to calculate the 
 exact number of rabbits in the final cell.
  The good news is we don’t need to.
  All we need to figure out
  is how many trailing zeros it has.
  But how can we know how many trailing 
 zeros a number has
  without calculating the number itself?
  What we do know is that we arrive at the
 number of rabbits in the bottom cell
  through a process of multiplication –
  literally.
  The number of rabbits in each cell
  is the product of the number of rabbits 
 in each of the two cells above it.
  And there are only two ways
  to get numbers with trailing zeros 
 through multiplication:
  either multiplying a number ending in 5 
 by any even number,
  or by multiplying numbers that have 
 trailing zeroes themselves.
  Let’s calculate the number of rabbits 
 in the second row
  and see what patterns emerge.
  Two of the numbers have trailing zeros –
  20 rabbits in the fourth cell 
 and 30 in the fifth cell.
  But there are no numbers ending in 5.
  And since the only way to get a number 
 ending in 5 through multiplication
  is by starting with a number ending in 5,
  there won’t be any more 
 down the line either.
  That means we only need to worry
  about the numbers that have 
 trailing zeros themselves.
  And a neat trick to figure out the amount
 of trailing zeros in a product
  is to count and add the trailing zeros 
 in each of the factors –
  for example, 10 x 100 = 1,000.
  So let’s take the numbers in the fourth 
 and fifth cells
  and multiply down from there.
  20 and 30 each have one zero,
  so the product of both cells will have 
 two trailing zeros,
  while the product of either cell and 
 an adjacent non-zero-ending cell
  will have only one.
  When we continue all the way down,
  we end up with 35 zeros 
 in the bottom cell.
  And if you’re not too stressed about 
 the potential nano-rabbit apocalypse,
  you might notice that counting 
 the zeros this way
  forms part of Pascal’s triangle.
  Adding those 35 zeros to the 
 46 digit number we had before
  yields an 81 digit number –
  too big for the habitat to contain!
  You rush over and pull 
 the emergency switch
  just as the seventh generation of rabbits 
 was about to mature –
  hare-raisingly close to disaster.