The meaning of life according to Simone de Beauvoir - Iseult Gillespie
At the age of 21, Simone de Beauvoir
became the youngest person
to take the philosophy exams
at France’s most esteemed university.
She passed with flying colors.
But as soon as she mastered
the rules of philosophy,
she wanted to break them.
She’d been schooled
on Plato’s Theory of Forms,
which dismissed the physical world
as a flawed reflection
of higher truths and unchanging ideals.
But for de Beauvoir,
earthly life was enthralling, sensual,
and anything but static.
Her desire to explore the physical world
to its fullest would shape her life,
and eventually,
inspire a radical new philosophy.
Endlessly debating with her romantic
and intellectual partner Jean Paul Sartre,
de Beauvoir explored free will, desire,
rights and responsibilities,
and the value of personal experience.
In the years following WWII,
these ideas would converge
into the school of thought
most closely associated with their work:
existentialism.
Where Judeo-Christian traditions
taught that
humans are born with preordained purpose,
de Beauvoir and Sartre proposed
a revolutionary alternative.
They argued that humans are born free,
and thrown into existence
without a divine plan.
As de Beauvoir acknowledged, this freedom
is both a blessing and a burden.
In "The Ethics of Ambiguity" she argued
that our greatest ethical imperative
is to create our own life’s meaning,
while protecting the freedom
of others to do the same.
As de Beauvoir wrote,
“A freedom which is interested only
in denying freedom must be denied.”
This philosophy challenged its students
to navigate the ambiguities and conflicts
our desires produce,
both internally and externally.
And as de Beauvoir sought to find
her own purpose,
she began to question:
if everyone deserves
to freely pursue meaning,
why was she restricted by society’s ideals
of womanhood?
Despite her prolific writing,
teaching and activism,
de Beauvoir struggled
to be taken seriously by her male peers.
She’d rejected her Catholic upbringing
and marital expectations
to study at university, and write memoirs,
fiction and philosophy.
But the risks she was taking
by embracing this lifestyle
were lost on many
of her male counterparts,
who took these freedoms for granted.
They had no intellectual interest
in de Beauvoir’s work,
which explored women’s inner lives,
as well the author’s open relationship
and bisexuality.
To convey the importance
of her perspective,
de Beauvoir embarked
on her most challenging book yet.
Just as she’d created the foundations
of existentialism,
she’d now redefine the limits of gender.
Published in 1949, "The Second Sex"
argues that, like our life’s meaning,
gender is not predestined.
As de Beauvoir famously wrote,
“one is not born, but rather becomes,
woman.”
And to “become” a woman, she argued,
was to become the Other.
De Beauvoir defined Othering
as the process of labeling women
as less than the men who’d
historically defined, and been defined as,
the ideal human subjects.
As the Other, she argued that women
were considered second to men,
and therefore systematically restricted
from pursuing freedom.
"The Second Sex" became
an essential feminist treatise,
offering a detailed history
of women’s oppression
and a wealth of anecdotal testimony.
"The Second Sex"’s combination
of personal experience
and philosophical intervention
provided a new language
to discuss feminist theory.
Today, those conversations are still
informed by de Beauvoir’s insistence
that in the pursuit of equality,
“there is no divorce between
philosophy and life.”
Of course, like any foundational work,
the ideas in "The Second Sex" have been
expanded upon since its publication.
Many modern thinkers have explored
additional ways people are Othered
that de Beauvoir doesn’t acknowledge.
These include racial
and economic identities,
as well as the broader spectrum of gender
and sexual identities we understand today.
De Beauvoir’s legacy
is further complicated
by accusations of sexual misconduct
by two of her university students.
In the face of these accusations,
she had her teaching license revoked
for abusing her position.
In this aspect and others,
de Beauvoir’s life remains controversial—
and her work represents a contentious
moment in the emergence of early feminism.
She participated in those conversations
for the rest of her life;
writing fiction, philosophy,
and memoirs until her death in 1986.
Today, her work offers
a philosophical language
to be reimagined, revisited
and rebelled against—
a response this revolutionary thinker
might have welcomed.
